Amnesty: Said and Unsaid.
Amnesty; 1964 Dictatorship. Speeches; Genealogy of Power.
This research aims to apply Foucault's genealogical method in the search for subjected discourses on the last Brazilian amnesty. In this way, understanding that the real history of the amnesty, alluding to the dictatorial regime of 1964, demonstrates that many power relations were waged in that context, which, in turn, caused different discourses to emerge around the issue, which had repercussions on the model enshrined in Law 6.683/79. In these events, some discourses gained predominance, while others were buried and made invisible. In this context, the research aims to investigate which discourses were buried, which means uncovering the power relations that caused this effect. The introduction seeks to demonstrate the historical context of the time, based on the effervescence of discourses on amnesty coming from various actors. After explaining what the genealogical method consists of, the research demonstrates the tone of the hegemonic discourse around amnesty, as well as the power relations that raised them to this status. On the other hand, the research then investigates the effects of power relations in the process of burying counter-hegemonic discourses, a genealogy of power over subjected discourses Finally, the research reveals the extent to which power relations are still present and their effects on the discourses on amnesty. With this, the research promotes reflections on the current scenario, which still intends forces around the meanings of amnesty.