Banca de QUALIFICAÇÃO: Danniel Gustavo Bomfim Araújo da Silva

Uma banca de QUALIFICAÇÃO de DOUTORADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : Danniel Gustavo Bomfim Araújo da Silva
DATE: 10/10/2023
TIME: 16:00
LOCAL: https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3a0S0hx1n36IGWHVS4gHEmYTeOqV-LJWPxHvjstIhIiY01%40thread
TITLE:

The necessary improvement of criminal justice about the eyewitness identification.

KEY WORDS:

Eyewitness Identification. Eyewitness Testimony. False Memories. Neuroscience.

PAGES: 65
BIG AREA: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
AREA: Direito
SUMMARY:

The research aims to carry out a diagnosis on the practices of recognition of people and hearing of witnesses in the criminal justice of Acre. This evidence is predominantly used to delimit authorship in criminal proceedings, most of the time, in isolation, and based on the recognition document made at the inquisitorial headquarters, which makes it, in this scenario, unreliable. The recognition of people is routinely carried out by agents of the criminal justice system, in violation of the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, considered by the local court as a mere irregularity, on the grounds that the legal procedure provided for in Art. it would only be a mandatory non-compliance recommendation. This can produce radical effects within the criminal process, such as deprivation of liberty and wrongful criminal conviction. The relevance and need for research on evidence that depends on memory and its role in criminal proceedings stems not only from the consequences of errors in the procedure for collecting such evidence, which implies unjust convictions, but mainly from the need to to investigate the production of this evidence in the face of advances in neuroscience. The research also seeks to demonstrate the malleability of memory, different from the traditional view that memory is like a tape recorder, and its implications in the criminal process when evidence that depends on memory is produced and evaluated without considering neuroscience studies. Projects such as the Innocence Project Brasil, which began in the United States, the CONDEGE DPE/RJ report, research by the Ministry of Justice and the National Council of Justice demonstrate, in practice, a high incidence of judicial errors involving the aforementioned probative species and the need for improvement of criminal justice in the face of advances in neuroscience. In this context, it is important to analyze the view of legal practitioners on false memories and the main mistakes made in the collection of testimonial evidence and the recognition of people. It is also important to know techniques to increase the reliability in the production of such evidence that, although they have been used in other countries for some time, in Brazil the criminal justice system still treats the subject in a timid way.

COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Externo à Instituição - TIAGO GAGLIANO PINTO ALBERTO - UFPR
Presidente - 1172631 - BEATRIZ VARGAS RAMOS GONCALVES DE REZENDE
Interno - 1863338 - EVANDRO CHARLES PIZA DUARTE
Interno - ***.173.968-** - JOSE GERALDO DE SOUSA JUNIOR - UnB