PPGD PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO FACULDADE DE DIREITO Teléfono/Ramal: 99999-9999/99999 https://www.unb.br/pos-graduacao

Banca de DEFESA: Sura Agnieska Rodrigues Di Santos

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : Sura Agnieska Rodrigues Di Santos
DATE: 29/08/2022
TIME: 14:30
LOCAL: SALA A1-04
TITLE:

"The incarceration of mothers with children and pregnant women: analysis of the reasoning presented by the Court of Justice of the State of São Paulo to except the legal and jurisprudential frameworks when imposing pre-trial detentions, after the judgment of the HC 143.641/SP by the Brazilian Supreme Court".


KEY WORDS:

 imprisonment of women with children; gender stereotypes; house arrest; crime of drug trafficking


PAGES: 152
BIG AREA: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
AREA: Direito
SUMMARY:

This research aims to analyze the reasoning used by the Court of Justice of São Paulo on its rulings in habeas corpus - HC in 2018, in which the legality of provisional detentions of expecting ladies and women with children, served inside correctional facilities, was judged, after the Brazilian Supreme Court’s decision in the HC 143.641/SP. The research was done in two phases. First, from a quantitative and qualitative analysis, judgments were selected by the criteria of (a) rejection and (b) disregard of the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence established in the HC 143.641/SP. 424 rulings were selected. In that universe, the main reasons to deny the substitution of pre-trial custody for house arrest of mothers and pregnant women, even after the aforementioned habeas corpus was granted by the STF, were identified. Then, the judgments’ argumentative pattern was drawn in order to identify any gender stereotypes articulated on those rulings. This study concludes that there was partial resistance in adopting the house arrest of expecting ladies and mothers of children or teenagers with disabilities, and that the breadth of the expression “very exceptional cases”, used by the Supreme Court, weakened its own ruling, since it led to to the indiscriminate use of reasons alien to the rationality of the article Brazilian Criminal Procedure Code’s article 318 and unrelated to the premises settled in the aforementioned habeas corpus’s ruling, as well as gave room to the attribution of moral judgments and gender stereotypes on the grounds of deciding.


BANKING MEMBERS:
Interna - 1172631 - BEATRIZ VARGAS RAMOS GONCALVES DE REZENDE
Interna - 1952365 - CAMILA CARDOSO DE MELLO PRANDO
Externa à Instituição - CAROLINA COSTA FERREIRA - IDP
Presidente - 1904522 - JANAINA LIMA PENALVA DA SILVA
Notícia cadastrada em: 26/08/2022 12:12
SIGAA | Secretaria de Tecnologia da Informação - STI - (61) 3107-0102 | Copyright © 2006-2026 - UFRN - h-sigaa-01.sigaa01